N. Chandra Wickramasinghe (Cardiff University UK)
http://arxiv.org/abs/1104.1314v1
In this article I chronicle a series of landmark events, with which I
was personally involved, that relate to the development of the theory
of cosmic life. The interpretation of events offered here might invite
a sense of incredulity on the part of the reader, but the facts
themselves are unimpeachable in regard to their authenticity. Of
particular interest are accounts of interactions between key players
in an unfolding drama connected with the origins of life. Attempts to
censor evidence incompatible with the cosmic life theory are beginning
to look futile and a long-overdue paradigm shift may have to be
conceded.
Is the Universe homogeneous?
Roy Maartens (Western Cape, ICG, Portsmouth)
http://arxiv.org/abs/1104.1300v1
The standard model of cosmology is based on the existence of
homogeneous surfaces as the background arena for structure formation.
Homogeneity underpins both general relativistic and modified gravity
models and is central to the way in which we interpret observations of
the CMB and the galaxy distribution. However, homogeneity cannot be
directly observed in the galaxy distribution or CMB, even with perfect
observations, since we observe on the past lightcone and not on
spatial surfaces. We can directly observe and test for isotropy, but
to link this to homogeneity, we need to assume the Copernican
Principle. First, we discuss the link between isotropic observations
on the past lightcone and isotropic spacetime geometry: what
observations do we need to be isotropic in order to deduce spacetime
isotropy? Second, we discuss what we can say with the Copernican
assumption. The most powerful result is based on the CMB: the
vanishing of the dipole, quadrupole and octupole of the CMB is
sufficient to impose homogeneity. Real observations lead to
near-isotropy on large scales - does this lead to near-homogeneity?
There are important partial results, and we discuss why this remains a
difficult open question. Thus we are currently unable to prove
homogeneity of the Universe on large-scales, even with the Copernican
Principle. However we can use observations of galaxies and clusters to
test the Copernican Principle itself.
A smoother end to the dark ages
Zoltán Haiman (Columbia University)
http://arxiv.org/abs/1104.1189v1
Independent lines of evidence suggest that the first stars, which
ended the cosmic dark ages, came in pairs, rather than singly. This
could change the prevailing view that the early Universe had a
Swiss-cheese-like appearance.
The effects of galaxy formation on the matter power spectrum: A
challenge for precision cosmology
Marcel P. van Daalen (1 and 2), Joop Schaye (1), C. M. Booth (1),
Claudio Dalla Vecchia (1 and 3) ((1) Leiden Observatory, Leiden
University (2) Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics (3) Max Planck
Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics)
http://arxiv.org/abs/1104.1174v1
Upcoming weak lensing surveys, such as LSST, EUCLID, and WFIRST, aim
to measure the matter power spectrum with unprecedented accuracy. In
order to fully exploit these observations, models are needed that,
given a set of cosmological parameters, can predict the non-linear
matter power spectrum at the level of 1% or better for scales
corresponding to comoving wave numbers 0.1<k<10 h/Mpc. We have
employed the large suite of simulations from the OWLS project to
investigate the effects of various baryonic processes on the matter
power spectrum. In addition, we have examined the distribution of
power over different mass components, the back-reaction of the baryons
on the CDM, and the evolution of the dominant effects on the matter
power spectrum. We find that single baryonic processes are capable of
changing the power spectrum by up to several tens of per cent. Our
simulation that includes AGN feedback, which we consider to be our
most realistic simulation as, unlike those used in previous studies,
it has been shown to solve the overcooling problem and to reproduce
optical and X-ray observations of groups of galaxies, predicts a
decrease in power relative to a dark matter only simulation ranging,
at z=0, from 1% at k~0.3 h/Mpc to 10% at k~1 h/Mpc and to 30% at k~10
h/Mpc. This contradicts the naive view that baryons raise the power
through cooling, which is the dominant effect only for k>70 h/Mpc.
Therefore, baryons, and particularly AGN feedback, cannot be ignored
in theoretical power spectra for k>0.3 h/Mpc. It will thus be
necessary to improve our understanding of feedback processes in galaxy
formation, or at least to constrain them through auxiliary
observations, before we can fulfil the goals of upcoming weak lensing
surveys.
Galaxy Bias and its Effects on the Baryon Acoustic Oscillations Measurements
Kushal T. Mehta, Hee-Jong Seo, Jonathan Eckel, Daniel J. Eisenstein,
Marc Metchnik, Philip Pinto, Xiaoying Xu
http://arxiv.org/abs/1104.1178v1
The baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) feature in the clustering of
matter in the universe serves as a robust standard ruler and hence can
be used to map the expansion history of the universe. We use high
force resolution simulations to analyze the effects of galaxy bias on
the measurements of the BAO signal. We apply a variety of Halo
Occupation Distributions (HODs) and produce biased mass tracers to
mimic different galaxy populations. We investigate whether galaxy bias
changes the non-linear shifts on the acoustic scale relative to the
underlying dark matter distribution presented by Seo et al (2009). For
the less biased HOD models (b < 3), we do not detect any shift in the
acoustic scale relative to the no-bias case, typically 0.10% \pm
0.10%. However, the most biased HOD models (b > 3) show a shift at
moderate significance (0.79% \pm 0.31% for the most extreme case). We
test the one-step reconstruction technique introduced by Eisenstein et
al. (2007) in the case of realistic galaxy bias and shot noise. The
reconstruction scheme increases the correlation between the initial
and final (z = 1) density fields achieving an equivalent level of
correlation at nearly twice the wavenumber after reconstruction.
Reconstruction reduces the shifts and errors on the shifts. We find
that after reconstruction the shifts from the galaxy cases and the
dark matter case are consistent with each other and with no shift. The
1-sigma systematic errors on the distance measurements inferred from
our BAO measurements with various HODs after reconstruction are about
0.07% - 0.15%.
No comments:
Post a Comment