Authors: Yun Wang, Will Percival, Andrea Cimatti, Pia Mukherjee, Luigi Guzzo, Carlton M. Baugh, Carmelita Carbone, Paolo Franzetti, Bianca Garilli, James E. Geach, Cedric G. Lacey, Elisabetta Majerotto, Alvaro Orsi, Piero Rosati, Lado Samushia, Giovanni Zamorani
A space-based galaxy redshift survey would have enormous power in constraining dark energy and testing general relativity, provided that its parameters are suitably optimized. We study viable space-based galaxy redshift surveys, exploring the dependence of the Dark Energy Task Force (DETF) figure-of-merit (FoM) on redshift accuracy, redshift range, survey area, target selection, and forecast method. Fitting formulae are provided for convenience. We also consider the dependence on the information used: the full galaxy power spectrum P(k), P(k) marginalized over its shape, or just the Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO). We find that the inclusion of growth rate information (extracted using redshift space distortion and galaxy clustering amplitude measurements) leads to a factor of ~ 3 improvement in the FoM, assuming general relativity is not modified. This inclusion partially compensates for the loss of information when only the BAO are used to give geometrical constraints, rather than using the full P(k) as a standard ruler. We find that a space-based galaxy redshift survey covering ~20,000 sq deg over 0.5 < z < 2 with \sigma_z/(1+z)<= 0.001 exploits a redshift range that is only easily accessible from space, extends to sufficiently low redshifts to allow both a vast 3-D map of the universe using a single tracer population, and overlaps with ground-based surveys to enable robust modeling of systematic effects. We argue that these parameters are close to their optimal values given current instrumental and practical constraints.
Mass discrepancy in galaxy clusters as a result of the offset between dark matter and baryon distributions
Recent studies of lensing clusters reveal that it might be fairly common for a galaxy cluster that the X-ray center has an obvious offset from its gravitational center which is measured by strong lensing. We argue that if these offsets exist, then X-rays and lensing are indeed measuring different regions of a cluster, and may thus naturally result in a discrepancy in the measured gravitational masses by the two different methods. Here we investigate theoretically the dynamical effects of such lensing-X-ray offsets, and compare with observational data. We find that for typical values, the offset alone can give rise to a factor of two difference between the lensing and X-ray determined masses for the core regions of a cluster, suggesting that such "offset effect" may play an important role and should not be ignored in our dynamical measurements of clusters.
Confronting Dark Energy Models using Galaxy Cluster Number Counts
The mass function of galaxy clusters and their redshift distribution are computed for 12 distinct accelerating cosmological scenarios and confronted to the predictions of the conventional flat $\Lambda$CDM model. The comparison with $\Lambda$CDM is a two-step process. Firstly, we determine the free parameters of all models through a joint analysis involving the latest cosmological data from SNe type Ia, CMB shift parameter and BAO. Apart from a brane world inspired cosmology, it is found that the derived Hubble relation of the remaining models reproduce the $\Lambda$CDM results approximately with the same degree of statistical confidence. Secondly, in order to distinguish the different models from the expectations of $\Lambda$CDM, we discuss the predicted cluster redshift distribution on the basis of two future cluster surveys: (i)an X-ray survey based on the {\tt eROSITA} satellite, and (ii) a Sunayev-Zeldovich survey based on the Southern Polar Telescope. As a result, we find that the predictions of 6 out of 12 dark energy models can be clearly distinguished from the $\Lambda$CDM cosmology, only 1 of them can probably be distinguished, while 5 models are statistically equivalent to $\Lambda$CDM cosmology, as long as the expected cluster mass function and redshift distribution are concerned. The present analysis suggest that such a technique appears to be very competitive to independent tests probing the late time evolution of the Universe and the associated dark energy effects.
Gamma-ray Signal from Earth-mass Dark Matter Microhalos
Earth-mass dark matter microhalos with size of $\sim$ 100 AUs are the first structures formed in the universe, if we consider neutralino as the dark matter candidate. Early studies suggested that a noticeable fraction of microhalos born in early universe have survived up to present time and they might be observed as the dominant sources of the annihilation signal. On the other hand, others claimed that small-scale structure have a negligible impact on dark matter detectability. Here, we report the results of ultra-high-resolution simulation of the formation and evolution of these microhalos. We found that microhalos have the central density cusp of the form $\rho \propto r^{-1.5}$, much steeper than the cusp of larger dark halos. The very central regions of these microhalos survive the encounters with stars down to the radius of a few kpcs from the galactic center. The nearest microhalos at distance of $\sim$ 0.1 pc, might be visible as point sources (radius less than 1'), with proper motion of $\sim 0.2$ degree per year. Subhalos are also observable by boosts due to microhalos. Also, we might be able to use the millisecond pulsar timing measurements by PPTA to detect microhalos.
On the Possibility of Anisotropic Curvature in Cosmology
In addition to shear and vorticity a homogeneous background may also exhibit anisotropic curvature. Here a class of spacetimes is shown to exist where the anisotropy is solely of the latter type, and the shear-free condition is supported by a canonical, massless 2-form field. A distortion of the luminosity distances is derived and used to test the model against supernovae and the CMB.
Conceptual problems in detecting the evolution of dark energy when using distance measurements
Authors: Krzysztof Bolejko
Dark energy is now one of the most important and topical problems in cosmology. The first step to reveal its nature is to detect the evolution of dark energy or to prove beyond doubt that the cosmological constant is indeed constant. However, in the standard approach to cosmology, the Universe is described by the homogeneous and isotropic Friedmann models and nearly all sets of cosmological observations are analyzed within the framework of the homogeneous models. This paper shows that in the perturbed universe (even if perturbations vanish if averaged over sufficiently large scale) the distance relation is not the same as in the unperturbed universe. This has a serious consequence when studying the nature of dark energy, and as shown here can impair the analysis and studies of dark energy. An example of the Swiss-Cheese model is presented and it is shown that perturbations (even if <\delta\rho> =0) do affect observations and that the perturbed distance relation does not oscillate around the unperturbed value. Therefore, if future observations are analyzed only within the homogeneous framework then the impact of inhomogeneities (such as voids and superclusters) can be mistaken for evolving dark energy.
No comments:
Post a Comment