Monday, December 19, 2011

arXiv: 14 December 2011

 The Impact of Assuming Flatness in the Determination of Neutrino Properties from Cosmological Data
 Recent cosmological data have provided new constraints on the number of neutrino species and on the neutrino mass. However these constraints depend on assumptions related to the underlying cosmology. Since a correlation is expected between the number of effective neutrinos, N_{eff}, the neutrino mass \sum M_\nu, and the curvature of the universe, \Omega_k, it is useful to investigate the current constraints in the framework of a non-flat universe. In this paper we update the constraints on neutrino parameters by making use of the latest Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) data from the ACT and SPT experiments and consider the possibility of a universe with non-zero curvature. We first find a negative correlation between curvature and N_{eff} with a correlation coefficient of -0.36 and we place new constraints on N_{eff} and \Omega_k, with N_{eff} = 4.03 +/- 0.45 and 10^3, \Omega_k = -4.46 +/- 5.24. Thus, even when \Omega_k is allowed to vary, N_{eff} = 3 is still disfavored at 95% confidence. The correlation between neutrino mass and curvature is much stronger, with a correlation coefficient of 0.78 that shifts the 95% upper limit of \sum M_\nu < 0.446 eV to \sum M_\nu < 0.948 eV. Thus, the impact of assuming flatness in neutrino cosmology is significant and an essential consideration with future experiments.
 
  Is Dark Energy Falsifiable?
Authors: Carl H. Gibson (University of California at San Diego), Rudolph E. Schild (Harvard University)
 Is the accelerating expansion of the Universe true, inferred through observations of distant supernovae, and is the implied existence of an enormous amount of anti-gravitational dark energy material driving the accelerating expansion of the universe also true? To be physically useful these propositions must be falsifiable; that is, subject to observational tests that could render them false, and both fail when viscous, diffusive, astro-biological and turbulence effects are included in the interpretation of observations. A more plausible explanation of negative stresses producing the big bang is turbulence at Planck temperatures. Inflation results from gluon viscous stresses at the strong force transition. Anti-gravitational (dark energy) turbulence stresses are powerful but only temporary. No permanent dark energy is needed. At the plasma-gas transition, viscous stresses cause fragmentation of plasma proto-galaxies into dark matter clumps of primordial gas planets, each of which falsifies dark-energy cold-dark-matter cosmologies. Clumps of these planets form all stars, and explain the alleged accelerating expansion of the universe as a systematic dimming error of Supernovae Ia by light scattered in the hot turbulent atmospheres of evaporated planets surrounding central white dwarf stars.

No comments: