Monday, October 10, 2011

arXiv: 7 October 2011

Anti-de-Sitter spacetime and its uses
Authors:G.W. Gibbons
This is a pedagogic account of some of the global properties of Anti-de-Sitter spacetime with a view to their application to the AdS/CFT correspondence. Particular care is taken over the distinction between Anti-de-Sitter and it's covering space.
Written version of lectures given at 2nd Samos Meeting held at at Pythagoreon, Samos, Greece, 31 August - 4 September 1998 and published as Anti-de-Sitter spacetime and its uses, in Mathematical and Quantum Aspects of Relativity and Cosmology. Proceedings of the 2nd Samos Meeting on Cosmology, Geometry and Relativity, S Cotsakis and G W Gibbons eds, {\it Lecture Notes in Physics}\, {\bf 537} (2000)}
 
On the Effects of Line-of-Sight Structures on Lensing Flux-ratio Anomalies in a LCDM Universe
The flux-ratio anomalies observed in multiply-lensed quasar images are most plausibly explained as the result of perturbing structures superposed on the underlying smooth matter distribution of the primary lens. The cold dark matter cosmological model predicts that a large number of substructures should survive inside larger halos but, surprisingly, this population alone has been shown to be insufficient to explain the observed distribution of the flux ratios of quasar's multiple images. Additional contributions from other halos (and their own subhalos) projected along the line of sight to the primary lens have been considered as a possible explanation, with inconclusive results so far. We use ray tracing through the Millennium II simulation to investigate the importanceof projection effects due to halos and subhalos of mass m>1E8 Msun/h and extend our analysis to lower masses, m>1E6 Msun/h, using Monte-Carlo halo distributions. We find that violations of the cusp-caustic relation caused by line-of-sight haloes are comparable to (or even larger than) those caused by intrinsic substructures. The magnitude of the violation depends strongly on the density profile and concentration of the intervening halos, but clustering plays only a minor role. For a typical lensing geometry (lens at redshift 0.6 and source at redshift 2), background haloes (behind the main lens) are more likely to cause a violation than foreground halos. The combined effect of substructures within the lens and along the line of sight in a LCDM universe results in a cusp-violation probability from lensing flux-ratio observations of ~20%. This is enough to reconcile the model with current data, but larger samples are required for a stronger test of the theory.
 
 

No comments: