arXiv: 12 August 2011
A Method for Measuring (Slopes of) the Mass Profiles of Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxies
We introduce a method for measuring the slopes of mass profiles within dwarf spheroidal (dSph) galaxies directly from stellar spectroscopic data and without adopting a dark matter halo model. Our method combines two recent results: 1) spherically symmetric, equilibrium Jeans models imply that the product of halflight radius and (squared) stellar velocity dispersion provides an estimate of the mass enclosed within the halflight radius of a dSph stellar component, and 2) some dSphs have chemo-dynamically distinct stellar \textit{sub}components that independently trace the same gravitational potential. We devise a statistical method that uses measurements of stellar positions, velocities and spectral indices to distinguish two dSph stellar subcomponents and to estimate their individual halflight radii and velocity dispersions. For a dSph with two detected stellar subcomponents, we obtain estimates of masses enclosed at two discrete points in the same mass profile, immediately defining a slope. Applied to published spectroscopic data, our method distinguishes stellar subcomponents in the Fornax and Sculptor dSphs, for which we measure slopes $\Gamma\equiv \Delta \log M / \Delta \log r=2.61_{-0.37}^{+0.43}$ and $\Gamma=2.95_{-0.39}^{+0.51}$, respectively. These values are consistent with 'cores' of constant density within the central few-hundred parsecs of each galaxy and rule out `cuspy' NFW profiles ($d\log M/d\log r \leq 2$ at all radii) with significance $\ga 96%$ and $\ga 99%$, respectively. Tests with synthetic data indicate that our method tends systematically to overestimate the mass of the inner stellar subcomponent to a greater degree than that of the outer stellar subcomponent, and therefore to underestimate the slope $\Gamma$ (implying that the stated NFW exclusion levels are conservative).
Halo models in modified gravity theories with self-accelerated expansion
We investigate the structure of halos in the sDGP (self-accelerating branch of the Dvali-Gavadadze-Porrati braneworld gravity) model and the galileon modified gravity model on the basis of the static and spherically symmetric solutions of the collisionless Boltzmann equation, which reduce to the singular isothermal sphere model and the King model in the limit of Newtonian gravity. The common feature of these halos is that the density of a halo in the outer region is larger (smaller) in the sDGP (galileon) model, respectively, in comparison with Newtonian gravity. This comes from the suppression (enhancement) of the effective gravity at large distance in the sDGP (galileon) model, respectively. However, the difference between these modified gravity models and Newtonian gravity only appears outside the halo due to the Vainshtein mechanism, which makes it difficult to distinguish between them. We also discuss the case in which the halo density profile is fixed independently of the gravity model for comparison between our results and previous work.
Does Baryonic Tully-Fisher Relation Conflict with LCDM?
The "baryonic" Tully-Fisher relation (BTFR) is an important observational constraint on cosmological and galactic models. However, the observed BTFR only accounts for stars, molecular, and atomic gas, while the contribution of ionized gas is almost universally missed. Comparison of such observations to theoretical predictions is, therefore, highly non-trivial, and requires a proper modeling of radiative transfer of ionizing radiation, at least in an approximate form. An example of such modeling is presented in the form of a cosmological numerical simulation with radiative transfer. The observed BTFR of model galaxies is in reasonable agreement with the observational data, because the contribution of ionized gas progressively increases for smaller and smaller galaxies. Hence, the observed BTFR cannot be used as an argument against the LCDM cosmological model.
No comments:
Post a Comment