arXiv: 19 Mar 2010

Light elements in stars with exoplanets
Authors: N.C. Santos, E. Delgado Mena, G. Israelian, J. I. González-Hernández, M. C. Gálvez-Ortiz, M. Mayor, S. Udry, R. Rebolo, S. Sousa, S. Randich
arXiv:1003.3544v1
It is well known that stars orbited by giant planets have higher abundances of heavy elements when compared with average field dwarfs. A number of studies have also addressed the possibility that light element abundances are different in these stars. In this paper we will review the present status of these studies. The most significant trends will be discussed.

Local Group Dwarf Spheroidals: Correlated Deviations from the Baryonic Tully-Fisher Relation
Authors: Stacy S. McGaugh, Joe Wolf
arXiv:1003.3448v1
Local Group dwarf spheroidal satellite galaxies are the faintest extragalactic stellar systems known. We examine recent data for these objects in the plane of the Baryonic Tully-Fisher Relation (BTFR). While some dwarf spheroidals adhere to the BTFR, others deviate substantially. We examine the residuals from the BTFR and find that they are not random. The residuals correlate with luminosity, size, metallicity, ellipticity, and susceptibility of the dwarfs to tidal disruption. Fainter, more elliptical, and tidally more susceptible dwarfs deviate further from the BTFR. We consider a variety of mechanisms that might lead to this behavior. Reionization does not, by itself, suffice to explain all aspects of the data. Further mechanisms such as supernova feedback or ram pressure stripping may remove gas that would otherwise be present to satisfy the baryonic mass budget. The correlation with ellipticity and tidal susceptibility implies that the usual assumption of spherical systems in stable equilibria may not hold, and suggests an alternate (or additional) mechanism by which baryons are lost through tidal stripping. In this case, we predict the mass of streams that should be associated with each dwarf in order to restore consistency with the BTFR. Finally, we consider an alternative to dark matter, MOND. The mass-to-light ratios of the dwarfs which adhere to the BTFR are reasonable, but those which deviate are not: the mass-to-light ratios of the ultrafaint dwarfs are far too high to be explained by MOND. This would falsify the theory if these objects are stable, bound systems. However, the dwarfs are considerably more susceptible to tidal effects in MOND than with dark matter. The deviation sets in where the observed radii of the dwarfs exceed the MONDian tidal radii. The extent to which the dwarfs are currently being tidally stripped therefore becomes a powerful test of the MOND hypothesis.