arXiv: 21 June 2011

Disentangling non-Gaussianity, bias and GR effects in the galaxy distribution

Marco Bruni (ICG, Portsmouth), Robert Crittenden (ICG, Portsmouth), Kazuya Koyama (ICG, Portsmouth), Roy Maartens (Western Cape, ICG, Portsmouth),Cyril Pitrou (ICG, Portsmouth), David Wands (ICG, Portsmouth)

arXiv:1106.3999v1

Local non-Gaussianity, parametrized by $f_{\rm NL}$, introduces a scale-dependent bias that is strongest at large scales, precisely where General Relativistic (GR) effects also become significant. With future data, it should be possible to constrain $f_{\rm NL} = {\cal O}(1)$ with high redshift surveys. GR corrections to the power spectrum and ambiguities in the gauge used to define bias introduce effects similar to $f_{\rm NL}= {\cal O}(1)$, so it is essential to disentangle these effects. We show how to consistently include primordial non-Gaussianity in the observed angular power spectrum of the galaxy distribution and we discuss how to distinguish between the various effects, so as to extract an accurate non-Gaussianity signal.

Phenomenology of Gravitational Aether as a solution to the Old Cosmological Constant Problem

Siavash Aslanbeigi, Georg Robbers, Brendan Z. Foster, Kazunori Kohri, Niayesh Afshordi

arXiv:1106.3955v1

One of the deepest and most long-standing mysteries in physics has been the huge discrepancy between the observed vacuum density and our expectations from theories of high energy physics, which has been dubbed the Old Cosmological Constant problem. One proposal to address this puzzle at the semi-classical level is to decouple quantum vacuum from space-time geometry via a modification of gravity that includes an incompressible fluid, known as Gravitational Aether. In this paper, we discuss classical predictions of this theory along with its compatibility with cosmological and experimental tests of gravity. We argue that deviations from General Relativity (GR) in this theory are sourced by pressure or vorticity. In particular, the theory predicts that the gravitational constant for radiation is 33% larger than that of non-relativistic matter, which is preferred by (most) cosmic microwave background (CMB), Lyman-Alpha forest, and Lithium-7 primordial abundance observations, while being consistent with other cosmological tests at ~2-sigma level. It is further shown that all Parametrized Post-Newtonian (PPN) parameters have the standard GR values aside from the anomalous coupling to pressure, which has not been directly measured. A more subtle prediction of this model (assuming irrotational aether) is that the (intrinsic) gravitomagnetic effect is 33% larger than GR prediction. This is consistent with current limits from LAGEOS and Gravity Probe B at ~2-sigma level.

Matter power spectra in dynamical-Dark Energy cosmologies

C. Fedeli, K. Dolag, L. Moscardini

arXiv:1106.3987v1

(abridged) We used a suite of numerical cosmological simulations in order to investigate the effect of gas cooling and star formation on the large scale matter distribution. The simulations follow the formation of cosmic structures in five different Dark Energy models: the fiducial $\Lambda$CDM cosmology and four models where the Dark Energy density is allowed to have a non-trivial redshift evolution. For each cosmology we have a control run with dark matter only, in order to allow a direct assessment of the impact of baryonic processes. We found that the power spectra of gas and stars, as well as the total matter power spectrum, are in qualitative agreement with the results of previous works in the framework of the fiducial model, although several quantitative differences exist. We used the halo model in order to investigate the backreaction of gas and stars on the dark matter distribution, finding that it is very well reproduced by increasing the average dark matter halo concentration by 17%, irrespective of the mass. Moving to model universes dominated by dynamical Dark Energy, it turns out that they introduce a specific signature on the power spectra of the various matter components, that is qualitatively independent of the exact cosmology considered. This generic shape is well captured by the halo model, however the finer details of the dark matter power spectrum can be precisely captured only at the cost of a few slight modifications to the ingredients entering the model. The backreaction of baryons onto the dark matter distribution works pretty much in the same way as in the reference $\Lambda$CDM model. Nonetheless, the increment in average concentration is less pronounced than in the fiducial model (only $\sim 10%$), in agreement with a series of other clues pointing toward the fact that star formation is less efficient when Dark Energy displays a dynamical evolution.