It is generally assumed that on sufficiently large scales the Universe is well-described as a homogeneous, isotropic FRW cosmology with a dark energy. Does the formation of nonlinear cosmic inhomogeneities produce a significant effect on the average large-scale FLRW dynamics? As an answer, we suggest that if the length scale at which homogeneity sets in is much smaller than the Hubble length scale, the back-reaction due to averaging over inhomogeneities is negligible. This result is supported by more than one approach to study of averaging in cosmology. Even if no single approach is sufficiently rigorous and compelling, they are all in agreement that the effect of averaging in the real Universe is small. On the other hand, it is perhaps fair to say that there is no definitive observational evidence yet that there indeed is a homogeneity scale which is much smaller than the Hubble scale, or for that matter, if today's Universe is indeed homogeneous on large scales. If the Copernican principle can be observationally established to hold, or is theoretically assumed to be valid, this provides strong evidence for homogeneity on large scales. However, even this by itself does not say what the scale of homogeneity is. If that scale is today comparable to the Hubble radius, only a fully non-perturbative analysis can establish or rule out the importance of cosmological back-reaction. This brief elementary report summarizes some recent theoretical developments on which the above inferences are based.
Anisotropic Extinction Distortion of the Galaxy Correlation Function Similar to the magnification of the galaxies' fluxes by gravitational lensing, the extinction of the fluxes by comic dust, whose existence is recently detected by Menard et al (2009), also modify the distribution of a flux-selected galaxy sample. We study the anisotropic distortion by dust extinction to the 3D galaxy correlation function, including magnification bias and redshift distortion at the same time. We find the extinction distortion is most significant along the line of sight and at large separations, similar to that by magnification bias. The correction from dust extinction is negative except at sufficiently large transverse separations, which is almost always opposite to that from magnification bias (we consider a number count slope s > 0.4). Hence, the distortions from these two effects tend to reduce each other. At low z (~<1), the distortion by extinction is stronger than that by magnification bias, but at high z, the reverse holds. We also study how dust extinction affects probes in real space of the baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) and the linear redshift distortion parameter beta. We find its effect on BAO is negligible. However, it introduces a positive scale-dependent correction to beta that can be as large as a few percent. At the same time, we also find a negative scale-dependent correction from magnification bias, which is up to percent level at low z, but to ~40% at high z. These corrections are non-negligible for precision cosmology, and should be considered when testing General Relativity through the scale-dependence of beta.
How unusual are the Shapley Supercluster and the Sloan Great Wall? We use extreme value statistics to assess the significance of two of the most dramatic structures in the local Universe: the Shapley supercluster and the Sloan Great Wall. If we assume that Shapley (volume ~ 1.2 x 10^5 (Mpc/h)^3) evolved from an overdense region in the initial Gaussian fluctuation field, with currently popular choices for the background cosmological model and the shape and amplitude sigma8 of the initial power spectrum, we estimate that the total mass of the system is within 20 percent of 1.8 x 10^16 Msun/h. Extreme value statistics show that the existence of this massive concentration is not unexpected if the initial fluctuation field was Gaussian, provided there are no other similar objects within a sphere of radius 200 Mpc/h centred on our Galaxy. However, a similar analysis of the Sloan Great Wall, a more distant (z ~ 0.08) and extended concentration of structures (volume ~ 7.2 x 10^5 (Mpc/h)^3) suggests that it is more unusual. We estimate its total mass to be within 20 percent of 1.2 x 10^17 Msun/h; even if it is the densest such object of its volume within z=0.2, its existence is difficult to reconcile with Gaussian initial conditions if sigma8 < 0.9. This tension can be alleviated if this structure is the densest within the Hubble volume. Finally, we show how extreme value statistics can be used to address the likelihood that an object like Shapley exists in the same volume which contains the Great Wall, finding, again, that Shapley is not particularly unusual. It is straightforward to incorporate other models of the initial fluctuation field into our formalism.
Combined Limits on WIMPs from the CDMS and EDELWEISS Experiments CDMS, EDELWEISS Collaborations: Z. Ahmed, D. S. Akerib, E. Armengaud, S. Arrenberg, C. Augier, C. N. Bailey, D. Balakishiyeva, L. Baudis, D. A. Bauer, A. Benoît, L. Bergé, J. Blümer, P. L. Brink, A. Broniatowski, T. Bruch, V. Brudanin, R. Bunker, B. Cabrera, D. O. Caldwell, B. Censier, M. Chapellier,G. Chardin, F. Charlieux, J. Cooley, P. Coulter, G. A. Cox, P. Cushman, M. Daal, X. Defay, M. De Jesus, F. DeJongh, P. C. F. Di Stefano, Y. Dolgorouki, J. Domange, L. Dumoulin, M. R. Dragowsky, K. Eitel, S. Fallows, E. Figueroa-Feliciano, J. Filippini, D. Filosofov, N. Fourches, J. Fox, M. Fritts, J. Gascon, G. Gerbier, J. Gironnet, S. R. Golwala, M. Gros, J. Hall, R. Hennings-Yeomans, S. Henry, S. A. Hertel, S. Hervé, D. Holmgren, L. Hsu, M. E. Huber, A. Juillard,O. Kamaev, et al. (55 additional authors not shown) The CDMS and EDELWEISS collaborations have combined the results of their direct searches for dark matter using cryogenic germanium detectors. The total data set represents 614 kg.d equivalent exposure. A straightforward method of combination was chosen for its simplicity before data were exchanged between experiments. The results are interpreted in terms of limits on spin-independent WIMP-nucleon cross-section. For a WIMP mass of 90 GeV/c^2, where this analysis is most sensitive, a cross-section of 3.3 x 10^{-44} cm^2 is excluded at 90% CL. At higher WIMP masses, the combination improves the individual limits, by a factor 1.6 above 700 GeV/c^2. Alternative methods of combining the data provide stronger constraints for some ranges of WIMP masses and weaker constraints for others Constraints on neutrino interactions using cosmological observations Observations of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) and large-scale structure (LSS) provide a unique opportunity to explore the fundamental properties of neutrinos. We report on how recent observations of the small angular-scale CMB provide us with an improved ability to constrain the neutrino background rest-frame sound speed, c_eff^2, and the viscosity parameter, c_vis^2. For a standard neutrino background these parameters both equal 1/3. A combination of CMB and LSS data gives c_eff^2 = 0.30 +0.035 -0.039 and c_vis^2 = 0.31 +0.3 -0.19 at the 95% confidence level. Fundamentally these constraints allow us to quantify the extent to which neutrinos are non-interacting around the time of the formation of structure in the CMB. We also discuss how constraints to these parameters from future observations (such as the Planck satellite) will allow us to explore the fundamental properties of any anomalous radiative energy density beyond the standard three neutrinos.
String Gas Cosmology: Progress and Problems arXiv:1105.3247v2
String Gas Cosmology is a model of the evolution of the very early universe based on fundamental principles and key new degrees of freedom of string theory which are different from those of point particle field theories. In String Gas Cosmology the universe starts in a quasi-static Hagedorn phase during which space is filled with a gas of highly excited string states. Thermal fluctuations of this string gas lead to an almost scale-invariant spectrum of curvature fluctuations. Thus, String Gas Cosmology is an alternative to cosmological inflation as a theory for the origin of structure in the universe. This short review focuses on the building blocks of the model, the predictions for late time cosmology, and the main problems which the model face
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment