Authors: Charles Shapiro, Scott Dodelson, Ben Hoyle, Lado Samushia, Brenna Flaugher
http://arxiv.org/abs/1004.4810v1
http://arxiv.org/abs/1004.4810v1
One of the most pressing issues in cosmology is whether general relativity (GR) plus a dark sector is the underlying physical theory or whether a modified gravity model is needed. Upcoming dark energy experiments designed to probe dark energy with multiple methods can address this question by comparing the results of the different methods in constraining dark energy parameters. Disagreement would signal the breakdown of the assumed model (GR plus dark energy). We study the power of this consistency test by projecting constraints in the w_0-w_a plane from the four different techniques of the Dark Energy Survey in the event that the underlying true model is modified gravity. We find that the standard technique of looking for overlap has some shortcomings, propose as an alternative the Multi-dimensional Consistency Test, and introduce the methodology for projecting whether a given experiment will be able to distinguish a modified gravity model from GR.
No comments:
Post a Comment