arXiv: 12 Feb 2010

How to optimally parametrize deviations from General Relativity in the evolution of cosmological perturbations?
Authors: Levon Pogosian, Alessandra Silvestri, Kazuya Koyama, Gong-Bo Zhao
arXiv:1002.2382v1
The next generation of weak lensing surveys will trace the growth of large scale perturbations through a sequence of epochs, offering an opportunity to test General Relativity (GR) on cosmological scales. We review in detail the parametrization used in MGCAMB to describe the modified growth expected in alternative theories of gravity and generalized dark energy models. We highlight its advantages and examine several theoretical aspects. In particular, we show that the same set of equations can be consistently used on super-horizon and sub-horizon linear scales. We also emphasize the sensitivity of data to scale-dependent features in the growth pattern, and propose using Principal Component Analysis to converge on a practical set of parameters which is most likely to detect departures from GR. The connection with other parametrizations is also discussed.

How close can an Inhomogeneous Universe mimic the Concordance Model?
Authors: Peter Dunsby, Naureen Goheer, Bob Osano, Jean-Philippe Uzan
arXiv:1002.2397v1
Recently, spatially inhomogeneous cosmological models have been proposed as an alternative to the LCDM model, with the aim of reproducing the late time dynamics of the Universe without introducing a cosmological constant or dark energy. This paper investigates the possibility of distinguishing such models from the standard LCDM using background or large scale structure data. It also illustrates and emphasizes the necessity of testing the Copernican principle in order to confront the tests of general relativity with the large scale structure.